With such a large, linear and relatively fast-tracked project, conducting an environmental investigation of this scale was a challenge surmounted by dividing the project into manageable pieces. This legacy of contamination has restricted investment and redevelopment within an area primarily occupied by minority and immigrant populations who face economic challenges on a daily basis. Data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) indicated that 7% of Minnesota’s contaminated sites are located within the Central Corridor area. Previous industrial, manufacturing and commercial uses of the corridor resulted in underlying soil and groundwater contamination, making the Central/METRO Green Line corridor a considerably-sized Brownfields site. Appropriately, this corridor was historically used for transit for more than a century, first with street cars followed by busses. This corridor would connect sports venues, a university campus, the State Capitol, and various unique neighborhoods to further cement the “twin” in the Twin Cities. Paul, identified an 11-mile corridor for the METRO Green Line project. The Metropolitan Council along with its project partners, including the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, and the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Later realized as Central Corridor Light Rail or the METRO Green Line, this light rail transit line was intended to increase access for the labor force, support job growth, mitigate roadway congestion, and encourage economic development. Paul was envisioned in the Twin Cities for decades. Even before the construction of the first light rail line, known as the METRO Blue Line, an effective mode of transit connecting the downtowns of Minneapolis and St.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |